King Neptune Virginia Beach Oceanfront |
But having characters worth caring about isn’t enough, is it? There has to be more to keep readers turning pages and saving their pennies to buy the next installment in your series about a serial-killer-turned-nun who runs a detective agency out of a convent. That something else is conflict. As James Scott Bell tells us in Conflict & Suspense, “Conflict has long been recognized as the engine of story. Without conflict there is no drama. Without drama, there is no interest. Without interest there is no reader. And no writing career.”
Forgive my poor math skills, but I think
this is the equation:
Characters +
Conflict = New York Times Bestsellers List
Wow! Seems simple enough. How tough can
it be? For some writers, it’s apparently “Easy-peasy, lemon-squeezy.” Interesting,
relatable characters involved in all sorts of conflict leading to dramatic,
page-turning novels flow effortlessly from their fingers to the keyboard. For
me, and many others, it’s a struggle. Hmmm, a struggle. That’s a kind of
conflict, isn’t it? Conflict, we learn, can be relatively minor, e.g., a small disagreement with emotion attached to it, or major, e.g., war. It can be
internal (self-doubt, etc.) or external (person vs. person or person vs.
environment, etc.).
In the four corners of a single blog
entry, I can’t do justice to either of the components on the left side of the
equation. However, many books and articles provide the necessary roadmap—a
detailed discussion of how to combine characters and conflict into a successful,
compelling narrative. Along with the two books noted earlier, David Corbett’s The Compass of Character is an excellent
source of information and insight.
Today’s blog deals with one technique for landing characters in conflict with one another by reference to their personality preferences as outlined in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®). If you know what I mean when I say “I’m an ISTJ,” you have likely already been exposed to this way of looking at personality/character traits and may have even established your four-letter MBTI profile.
The MBTI was developed by Katherine
Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers. According to Introduction to Type®, published by CPP, Inc., the MBTI springs
from the psychological type theory of personality developed by Swiss
psychiatrist Carl G. Jung to explain normal
personality differences between healthy
people.
I can’t, and don’t intend to, make
people experts in the MBTI or Jung’s psychological type theory. My goal is to
tell you my understanding of the MBTI and how it might be used in developing
characters and conflict.
Everyone has certain preferences for how
they gather and interpret information, how they “recharge their batteries,” and
how they deal with other people and the world around them. The MBTI lists four “dichotomies,”
indicating each individual’s preferences. They four dichotomies and their
single-letter identifiers are:
1. Introversion
(I) vs. Extraversion (E);
2. Sensing (S)
vs. Intuition (N);
3. Thinking (T)
vs. Feeling (F); and
4. Judging (J)
vs. Perceiving (P).
Let’s drill down on the first dichotomy,
Introversion (I) versus Extraversion (E), to see what these terms mean and how having
one character whose preferences differ from another character can lead to
conflict.
According to Introduction to Type®,
“People who prefer Introversion like to focus on their own inner world of ideas
and experiences. They direct their energy and attention inward and receive energy
from reflecting on their thoughts, memories, and feelings.”
On the other hand, “People who prefer
Extraversion like to focus on the outer world of ideas of people and activity.
They direct their energy and attention outward and receive energy from
interacting with people and from taking action.” Note that it’s “Extraversion” and not “Extroversion.”
There are sixteen combinations of
letters as shorthand for various “types.” The combinations reflect preferences
resulting in various ways of interacting with others and events. Having an ISTJ
interact with an ENFP, i.e., his or her polar opposite in the MBTI, can result
in conflict if the differences are not surfaced, understood, and managed
effectively. Subsequent blogs will look at the various dichotomies and combinations.
Today, we’ll focus on Introversion (I) versus Extraversion (E).
Suppose you have a husband who’s an “I”
and a wife who’s an “E.” They’ve both had a long, exhausting, and frustrating
day at work. They both need to recharge their batteries—to energize themselves for another day at work tomorrow—according
to their respective MBTI preferences. The husband (I) says, “What a day. I’m
exhausted. I’m looking forward to a quiet night at home.” The wife (E) says “What
a day. I’m exhausted. Let’s go dancing.”
Consider the above scenario as a writing-prompt. You can likely see how, if the different preferences for gathering energy are not managed effectively, nasty, hurtful words will be spoken. The result? Conflict perhaps leading to irreparable damage to their relationship. “Why can’t you leave me alone for once?”; “Don’t you love me anymore? You used to enjoy dancing,”; “What, do these jeans make me look fat?”
Thoughts? Looking forward to a lively discussion. But remember. I’m an Introvert. Be kind.
Mike
13 comments:
Great blog post, Michael. Where can I get the book about "a serial-killer-turned-nun who runs a detective agency out of a convent." Sounds fun!
Hi Michael! Great ideas! I'm an INTP in case you are interested.
Great post! Without conflict, there is no story, and without a story, there are no readers. Conflicts keep readers turning the pages.
The die is cast. The Rubicon is crossed. No turning back now!
Thanks, Maria! Future blogs will delve into more of the "dichotomies." I think you'll be very interested in the potential conflicts associated with the "J" vs. "P" approaches. Mike
Thanks, Teresa! Conflicts, big and small, make the world go 'round. Mike
Conflict is good. We must keep that in mind.
Hi, Anonymous. We're still working through kinks, trying to figure out why we can't comment/reply in our Blogger Names. I guess that's a form of conflict, so I suppose it's good. We will be stronger once we figure out how to fix it. In any event, looks like technology is another source of conflict beyond looking to the MBTI dichotomies. All the best, Mike
Now I can comment as me! I had to go to Google Blogger via Google Chrome.
Yvonne: There are so many ways to use this Indicator to cause conflict in a story. The picture of an author with an evil grin and going “muhahaha” while creating mayhem comes to mind!
Mike, great post. I guess I never really thought of using the Meyer Briggs approach to create characters and conflict but I like it! It's been a while since I have delved into this so if you are going to post on the other 'indicators,' I look forward to learning more and how it will improve not only my characters, (and conflict) but my writing as well! :)
Thanks so much for this! Not only for the suggestion of how to use Myers-Briggs to help develop characters, but also for the great writing book suggestions. I enjoyed Card's book & look forward to checking out the other two! As I read your post, visions of characters & conflicts came to mind. I can't wait to see what you suggest next!
I'll never forget your business card: Attorney, Introvert.
Post a Comment